Overview
Building successful FrameworX solutions follows a proven four-pillar methodology that ensures scalability, maintainability, and performance. This structured approach guides you from initial data modeling through to final deployment, with each pillar building upon the previous to create a complete industrial application.
The Four-Pillar Methodology
Foundation → Industrial Operation → Logic & Data → Visualization
Each pillar represents a critical layer of your solution, implemented in sequence for optimal results:
Pillar 1- Foundation - Unified Namespace: Tag, AssetTree, User Data Types
Pillar 2 - Industrial Operations - Process Modules: Devices, Alarms, Historian
Pillar 3 - Logic & Data Enrichment - Application Modules: Scripts, Datasets (SQL), Reports (PDF/JSON/XML(
Pillar 4 - User Interface Modules: Displays, Dashboards, Layouts. Desktop, Web and Mobile clients.
Why Follow This Methodology?
Field Proven
→ Catalog
Benefits of the Four-Pillar Approach
Benefit | Description | Impact |
---|---|---|
Structured Development | Clear sequence of implementation | Reduced errors and rework |
Scalability | Foundation supports growth | Easy expansion without redesign |
Maintainability | Organized architecture | Simplified troubleshooting |
Reusability | Template-based approach | Faster development |
Best Practices | Industry-proven patterns | Reliable solution |
Solution Templates
Quick Start Templates, with guided explorer
Template | Description | Components | Time to Explore |
---|---|---|---|
Basic HMI | Simple machine interface | Displays. Modbus , TouchPanel UI | 10 min |
SCADA Starter | Small SCADA system | Alarms, trends | 15 min |
MES Interface | Production tracking | Database, reports, KPIs | 20 min |
IIoT & MQTT | MQTT Edge Integration | MQTT Broker, Client & Publisher & SQL | 15 min |
Central Server ProveIt! | Situational Awareness, Corporation Level | Enterprise Unlimited, Local & Extended UNS, Direct Binding to MQTT | 20 min |
Industry Templates | |
---|---|
Discreet manufacturing
| Utilities
|
Continuous Process
| Edge & IIoT
|
Next Steps
After Understanding the Methodology
Deep Dive Into Each Pillar
Get Hands-ON
- Get Aware of the Quick Links Tables
- Follow a Tutorial
- Build a sample solution
- Follow a tutorial
- Modify a template
Quick Reference Tables
- → Four Pillars At a Glance
- → Modules Key Concepts Review
- → Development Time Estimates
- → Shorten Dev time & Increase Reliability Checklist
- → Best Practices Checklist
- → Common Pitfalls and Solutions
Four Pillars at a Glance
Four Pillars at a Glance | |||
---|---|---|---|
Pillar | Purpose | Key Components | Order |
UNS | Data foundation | Tags, Assets, UDTs | First |
Process | Field integration | Devices, Alarms, Historian | Second |
Application | Business logic | Scripts, Datasets, Reports | Third |
Interface | Visualization | Displays, Dashboards, Clients | Fourth |
Modules Key Concepts Review | |
---|---|
One Line Descriptions | Data Flow Examples |
Tags (UNS) → Devices (Read/write values) | Example 1: PLC to DisplayPLC → Driver (Device Point) → Tag → Display Example 2: PLC to Display, using Direct Binding. PLC address → Dynamic TagProvider → Display Example 3: Calculation to Database Tags → Script (Calculation) → Result Tag → Dataset (SQL) Example 4: User Command Display → Button Click → Tag Write (UNS) → Device → PLC |
Development Time Estimates | |||
---|---|---|---|
Solution Size | Tags | Development Time | Team Size |
Small | <1,000 | 1-2 weeks | 1 person |
Medium | 1,000-10,000 | 4-8 weeks | 2-3 people |
Large | 10,000-50,000 | 3-6 months | 3-5 people |
Enterprise | >50,000 | 6-12 months | 5+ people |
Note: Those are order of magnitude references. Specific requirements & workflow & user review process need to be accounted for.
Shorten Dev time & Increase Reliability Checklist | |
---|---|
What to do | Reason |
Start with UNS, not Displays | Displays seems easier, but without proper data structure, the total development time increases, and reliability decreases. |
Leverage UNS features | Local UNS Tags x Linked-Tags x Direct Mapping establishes the foundation for the entire solution Life-cycle |
Maintain Library of Classes, Symbols & Templates. | Create a solution-specific reusable artifacts. Keeps consistency. |
Building Modular Scalable solutions | Modular architecture & solid design, prevent errors to happen, and provide core to future requirements not yet identified or raised by the end-users, avoid monolithic solution design. |
Best Practices Checklist | |
---|---|
Design Phase
| Development Phase
|
Deployment Phase
| Maintenance Phase
|
Common Pitfalls and How to Resolve | ||
---|---|---|
Pitfall | Impact | How to Resolve |
No naming standard | Confusion, errors | Define and enforce standards early |
Skipping UDTs | Maintenance nightmare | Create templates for all equipment |
Over-polling devices | Performance issues | Optimize scan rates based on needs |
Complex displays | Operator confusion | Follow ISA-101, simplify graphics |
No documentation | Support difficulties | Document as you build |
Ignoring security | Vulnerabilities | Implement security from start |
Building successful FraeworX solutions follows a proven four-pill methodolog that ensures scalability, maintainability, and performance. This sapproach guides you from initial data modelig through to inal deplyment, with each pilla building upon the previous to create a coplete industrial application.
Found→ Integration → Logic → Visualization
Each pillar represents a critical layer of your solution, implemented in sequence optimal results:
Why Follow This Methodology?
Benefits of the Four-Pillar Approach
Benefit | Description | Ipact |
---|---|---|
Structured Developent | Cle sequence of implementation | Reduced errors and rework |
ScalabilitOverview | Foundation supports growth | Easy expansion without redesign |
Maintainability | Organized architecture | Simplified troubleshooting |
Reusability | Template-based approach | Faster development |
Best Practices | Industry-proven patterns | Reliable solution |
Comm Mistakes to Avoid
? Starting with displays-Without proer dat structure ? Skippin UDTs - Ladingto tag sprawl ? Direct device-to-display binding - Creating maintenance nightmares ? Ignoring naming conventions - Causing confusion later ? monolithic solutions - Instead of modular architecture
Pillar 1: Unified Namespace (Foundation)
Purpose
The Unified Namespace (UN) is your s'datafoundation - a single source of truth for all real-time and configuration data.
What to Build
- Tag Structure
- Define naming conventions
- Create tag hierarchy
- Set data s andranges
- Configure engineering units
- Asset Tree
- irror physical/logical structur
- Organize by area/process/equipmen
- Create navigable ierarchy
- User Data Types (UDTs)
- Create equipment templates
- Define standard bjects
- Buil reusable components
→ Sutin Dev - Use Case Example
Pillar2: Process Modules (Industrial Oerations)
P
Process modules connect your solutionto the hysica world, connecting & collecting dta from feld devices admanaging indusrial operations.
Wat to Build
- DevicCommunications
- Conigure channels and protocls
- Setp nodes and devices,
- Map points to tags, o use direct binding
- Alarm Management
- Define alarm areas and groups
- Configure conditions and limits
- Setup notifications
- Historian (Timeseries Data Collection)
- Configure historian storage
- Set collection rates
- Define retention olicies
P3: Application Module (Stre & Process)
Purpose
Appication modles add business logic, data processing, and integracapailities to transform raw data into actionable information.
What to B
- Database Integrato
- Connect to SQL databases
- Create queries and views
- Setup synchronization
- Business Loic
- Writeclculation scrits
- Imlement contl logic
- Crete data validation
- Reporting
- Design report templates
- Configure sedules
- Setupdistribution
DetailedAplication Modules Guide →
P 4UserInterface(Analyze& Visualize)
Purpose
The UI layer presents information to operators, managers, and stakeholders through interactive displays anddashboards.
WhattoBuild
- OperationalDisplays
- Processgraphics
- Controlpanels
- Navigationstructure
- Dashboards
- KPI visualization
- Alytics
- Mobile views
- Client Deploynt
- Richclients
- Web access
- Mobile I
Consolidate
Dev to Production Worklow
Overvw
FrameworX 10.1 follows a moular,scalable rchitecture designed for industrial applications fro small single-machine interfac to enterrise-wide systems. Understnding the platform arhitcturehelpsyoudesignrobustsolutions,ptimize peformance, and plan for growth. This gui exploesthe core componentsdataflow,anddeploymentpatterns that makeFrameworX a owerfl industial aplicatin platform.
FrameworX i morthn jus softwre tool,
It's the enablingield-prven architectre a methodology to deploy applics managing critical assetsfromlargedistributedsystemstostandalone edge apps. It unloks the sphistication, perforance and oenness f latest techologis, yet keepig a simple configuraion, and a clear cot with advantageous Total Cost of Ownership.
Reference Link
Solutions Guidebook (examples of solution rchitecture in production)
Solution Development Workflow
Specification to Solution Flow
Confiuration Workflow | |
---|---|
(1) Define Your Data | (2) Setup Indutrial Process Modules |
Unified Namespace (Local UNS) | SQL Database Connections and Queries |
DataExplorer | Scripts and Business Logic |
Extended UNS using Direct Binding | Reportsdata pub (PDF, CSV, HTML, XML & JSON |
(3) Setup pplication Module | (4) Ur Inerface Deign |
DevicesField Connections | Symbol Library extensions |
Alarms, Events, and Audit-trail | nified eigner(Canvas&ResponsiveDashboard) |
Historiantime-seriesdata | Layouts,Desktop(.NET),Web&rMobile(WebAssembly) |
SolutionDeployment Workflow
Development toProduction Flow
Tools Interaction
Complete Solution Lifecycle
== > Link to Development to Production Best Practices and Industry Standard pages.
Stage 1: Iitite (Planning)
Project Definition - Scope Developnt
Define clear boundaries and objectives
- ProjectScope Document
- Business Objectives
- ROI Targets
- Efficiency Goals
- Compliance Requirements
- Technical Requirements
- I/O Count
- User Count
- Integration oints
- Pefrmance Targets
- Constrains
- Budget
- Timeline
- Resources
- Technology
- SucCriteria
- Acceptance Tests
- Performance etrics
- Deliverables
- Business Objectives
Stakehler Analysis
Stakeholder | Role | Reqirment | Concerns |
---|---|---|---|
Operations | End Users | Intuitive interfacereliableoperation | Easeofuse,training |
Maintenance | SupportStaff | Diagnstic tools, documentation | Toubleshooting, upates |
Management | Decision Maks | Reports,KPIsROI | Cost,timeline,benefits |
IT | Infrastructure | Security,integration,standards | Compliance,comatibility |
Engineering | Technical Design | Flexibility, feates, erfrmance | Technical debt, calability |
RquirementsGathering
unctonal Rquirements Checkist
- Process control requirements
- Data acquisition nees
- Alarmmanagement requrements
- Reporting specifications
- User interface requirements
- I requirements
- Security requirements
- Performance requirements
Source:PLC-01 |
---|
Protocol:ModbusTCP |
IPAddress:<proteted fr ublic dcumets> Scan Rate: 1 scond Poi Count: 250 |
DataType HoldingRegisters: 150 |
Stage 2: sgn (Arhitcture)
Sytem ArchitectureDesign
rchitecture Decision Matrix
Component | Option 1 | Option 2 | Decision | Rationale |
---|---|---|---|---|
Depoyment | Stndalone | Distibuted | Distributed | Multiple sites |
Database | SQLite | SQL Server | SQL Server | Scale requireent |
Redundancy | None | Hot-Standby | Hot-Standby | Critical process |
Clients | Rich only | Rich + Web | Rich +Web | Remote access |
Local | Enterprise | Enterprise | Corporate reporting |
Network Architecture
Data Architecture
Tag Naming Convention
Standard: [Area_[Equipment]_[Component]_[Signal]
Examples:
WTP_PUMP01_MOTOR_RUNNING
WTP_PUMP01_MOTOR_SPEED_SP
WTP_TANK01_LEVEL_PV
BLDG_HVAC_AHU01_TEMP_SP
UNS Structure
|
UDT Design - UNS Data Template
UDT: MOTOR_VF0
|
Disay Archteture
NavigHierarchy
|
Stage 3ld (Developmet)
Dvelopment Workflow
Sprint Planning (Example of a 2-Week Sprint)
|
ConfigurationManagement
VersionControlStrategy
|
|
TstingStrategy
TestLevels
Level | Scope | Responsibility | Tools |
---|---|---|---|
UnitTesting | Individualcomponents | Developer | Designertestmde |
Integation Testing | Moule intactions | Developer | Runtimetest |
System Testing | Complete solution | QA Team | Test scripts |
Acceptance Testing | Business requirements | Customer | Testprocedures |
TestDocumentation-TestCaseTemlate
Test ID: TC 001 Feate: Pum Contrl |
---|
Precondition:
|
Steps
|
Expected Relt:
|
Actual Result: |
Stage 4: Deploy (Producton)
Deployment Plnning
Pre-Deploymen Checklst
- All tests passed
- Dcumetationcomplete
- Backupcreated
- Licensesverified
- Trainingcompleted
- Supportplanready
- Rollbak plan prepared
- Maintenance windw scheduled
Deployent Sequence
Delymet Sequence
|
Cmmissioning Process
System Commissioning Steps
System Comissoning Step
|
Commssioning Documation
Document | Purpoe | Responsibility |
---|---|---|
I/OList | Verifyallpoints | ControlsEngineer |
LoopSheets | Testeachcontrollop | Technician |
Alam List | Verify alarm functions | Operations |
Interloc Matrix | Test saety intercks | Safety Engineer |
Performance Log | Record system metrics | System Integrator |
Stage 5Support(Maintenance)
SupportStructure
SupportTiers
SupportTies
|
Maintenance Activities
Preventive Maintenance Schedule
Frequency | Tasks | Responsibility |
---|---|---|
aily | Check system status, Riw aarms, Mnitor erforance | Opratios |
Weekly | Backup soluion, Review logsChck disk sace | Maintenance |
Monthy | Archive data, Update dcumentation, Performance analsis | Engineering |
Quarterly | Security review, Disaster recovery test, Training update | Manage |
Annually | License renewalMajorupdates,Systemauit | All teams |
Continous Impovement
Performnce Moniorng
KPI Dashboard Example
|
Tools and Temlats
Project Maagement Tools
FrameworX Native Tools
Tool | Purpose | Description |
---|---|---|
Track Cross-Reference | Governance | monitor governance of all places a object is use. |
Track RecentChanges | Verso Control | liht,built-in, recrd of latest used phases |
Track Uusedobject | Optimation | Idntify objects potentially not in use |
Track VersionControl | Version Control | Keep automated VersionID to all modulestablesandobjects.Global VersionID for entire solution. |
Build, backup flag | Backup/Restore point | Crete a bcku copy of duct current stge |
Publish | Lok production version | FDA compliance, lock solution file version |
Tird-party recommend tools
Tool | Purpose | Comments |
---|---|---|
JIRA//Azure DevOps | Task tracking | critical for maintenance and productphases |
Git/VN | Vrsion control | Add comparing version, in top of bilt-in FramworX TrackChages ools |
Confluence | Document management | All phases |
Teams/Slack | Communction | Alhases |
Standard Templates
Avaable Temptes
- PojectCharter
- Requreents Secification
- Design Document
- Test Pan
- Dploy Guide
- Training Merals
- Support Prcedures
- ChageRequestForm
QualityGates
GateReviews
Gate Review
|
BestPractices
Do'sandDon'ts
DO:
- ?naming conventons consistently
- ? Document a decisions and chnges
- ? Test thooughly at eachtag
- ? Incld operators i dsignreviews
- ?Planfor 20-30%growth
- ? Use version control
- ?
DON'T:
- ? Skip testing to save time
- ? Ignore user feedback
- ?Hardcodevalues
- ?Forgetsecurity considerations
- ? eply without bakups
- ? Ass requiremeswon't chang
- ? Neglct documentation
Risk Management
Risk | Pobabilit | Impac | Mitigation |
---|---|---|---|
Scope Creep | Hig | Hgh | Clear chae control process |
Integration Issues | Medium | High | Early testing vendor support |
Performance Problems | Medium | Medium | Load testing, optimization |
User Resistance | Medium | Medium | Training, involvement, support |
Hardware Delays | Low | High | Early ordering, alternatives |
Workflow Optimization
Automation Opportunities
Collabatin Tips
The four-pillar methodology (UNS, Process Modules, Application Modules, UI) provides a unique organizational principle that differentiates Tatsoft from competitors. This architectural approach to documentation surpasses the typical product-centric organization seen in platforms like FactoryTalk or WinCC, potentially offering superior conceptual clarity for system designers. Building successful FrameworX solutions follows a proven four-pillar methodology that ensures scalability, maintainability, and performance. This structured approach guides you from initial data modeling through to final deployment, with each pillar building upon the previous to create a complete industrial application. The Four-Pillar Field Proven Methodology Foundation → Integration → Logic → Visualization Each pillar represents a critical layer of your solution, implemented in sequence for optimal results:
Why Follow This Methodology?Benefits of the Four-Pillar Approach
Common Mistakes to Avoid? Starting with displays - Without proper data structure ? Skipping UDTs - Leading to tag sprawl ? Direct device-to-display binding - Creating maintenance nightmares ? Ignoring naming conventions - Causing confusion later ? Building monolithic solutions - Instead of modular architecture Pillar 1: Unified Namespace (Foundation)PurposeThe Unified Namespace (UNS) is your solution's data foundation - a single source of truth for all real-time and configuration data. What to Build
→ Solution Dev - Use Case ExamplePillar 2: Process Modules (Industrial Operations)PurposeProcess modules connect your solution to the physical world, connecting & collecting data from field devices and managing industrial operations. What to Build
Pillar 3: Application Modules (Store & Process)PurposeApplication modules add business logic, data processing, and integration capabilities to transform raw data into actionable information. What to Build
Detailed Application Modules Guide → Pillar 4: User Interface (Analyze & Visualize)PurposeThe UI layer presents information to operators, managers, and stakeholders through interactive displays and dashboards. What to Build
| Best Practices | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | Best Practices | ||||||||||||||||||
Cross-Fnctional | Reuar snc meetingssharedworkspace | ||||||||||||||||||
RemoteTeams | Videocals, screen shrig, cloud tools | ||||||||||||||||||
Customer Interaction | Demos, prototypes,eedback sessions | ||||||||||||||||||
VendCoordination | Clear specifications, reula updates |
Next Steps
After Understanding Workfl
- Download Templaes
- ReviewExamples
- G Trning
Consolidate
Dev to Production Workflow
Overview
FrameworX 10.1 follows a modular, scalable architecture designed for industrial applications from small single-machine interfaces to enterprise-wide systems. Understanding the platform architecture helps you design robust solutions, optimize performance, and plan for growth. This guide explores the core components, data flow, and deployment patterns that make FrameworX a powerful industrial application platform.
FrameworX is more than just software tool,
It's the enabling field-proven architecture and methodology to deploy applications managing critical assets, from large distributed systems to standalone edge apps. It unlocks the sophistication, performance and openness of latest technologies, yet keeping a simple configuration, and a clear cost with advantageous Total Cost of Ownership.
Reference Link:
Solutions Guidebook (examples of solution architecture in production)
Solution Development Workflow
Specification to Solution Flow
Configuration Workflow | |
---|---|
(1) Define Your Data | (2) Setup Industrial Process Modules |
Unified Namespace (Local UNS) | SQL Database Connections and Queries |
DataExplorer | Scripts and Business Logic |
Extended UNS using Direct Binding | Reports, data pub (PDF, CSV, HTML, XML & JSON |
(3) Setup Application Modules | (4) User Interface Design |
Devices, Field Connections | Symbol Library extensions |
Alarms, Events, and Audit-trail | Unified Designer (Canvas & Responsive Dashboard) |
Historian, time-series data | Layouts, Desktop (.NET), Web &r Mobile (WebAssembly) |
Solution Deployment Workflow
Development to Production Flow
Tools Interaction
Complete Solution Lifecycle
== > Link to Development to Production Best Practices and Industry Standard pages.
Stage 1: Initiate (Planning)
Project Definition - Scope Development
Define clear boundaries and objectives:
- Project Scope Document
- Business Objectives
- ROI Targets
- Efficiency Goals
- Compliance Requirements
- Technical Requirements
- I/O Count
- User Count
- Integration Points
- Performance Targets
- Constrains
- Budget
- Timeline
- Resources
- Technology
- Success Criteria
- Acceptance Tests
- Performance Metrics
- Deliverables
- Business Objectives
Stakeholder Analysis
Stakeholder | Role | Requirements | Concerns |
---|---|---|---|
Operations | End Users | Intuitive interface, reliable operation | Ease of use, training |
Maintenance | Support Staff | Diagnostic tools, documentation | Troubleshooting, updates |
Management | Decision Makers | Reports, KPIs, ROI | Cost, timeline, benefits |
IT | Infrastructure | Security, integration, standards | Compliance, compatibility |
Engineering | Technical Design | Flexibility, features, performance | Technical debt, scalability |
Requirements Gathering
Functional Requirements Checklist
- Process control requirements
- Data acquisition needs
- Alarm management requirements
- Reporting specifications
- User interface requirements
- Integration requirements
- Security requirements
- Performance requirements
Data Collection Worksheet Example
Source: PLC-01 |
---|
Protocol: Modbus TCP |
IP Address: <protected from public documents> Scan Rate: 1 second Point Count: 250 |
DataTypes: Holding Registers: 150 |
Stage 2: Design (Architecture)
System Architecture Design
Architecture Decision Matrix
Component | Option 1 | Option 2 | Decision | Rationale |
---|---|---|---|---|
Deployment | Standalone | Distributed | Distributed | Multiple sites |
Database | SQLite | SQL Server | SQL Server | Scale requirements |
Redundancy | None | Hot-Standby | Hot-Standby | Critical process |
Clients | Rich only | Rich + Web | Rich + Web | Remote access |
Historian | Local | Enterprise | Enterprise | Corporate reporting |
Network Architecture
Data Architecture
Tag Naming Convention
Standard: [Area]_[Equipment]_[Component]_[Signal]
Examples:
WTP_PUMP01_MOTOR_RUNNING
WTP_PUMP01_MOTOR_SPEED_SP
WTP_TANK01_LEVEL_PV
BLDG_HVAC_AHU01_TEMP_SP
UNS Structure
|
UDT Design - UNS Data Template
UDT: MOTOR_VF0
|
Display Architecture
Navigation Hierarchy
|
Stage 3: Build (Development)
Development Workflow
Sprint Planning (Example of a 2-Week Sprints)
|
Configuration Management
Version Control Strategy
|
Change Management Process
|
Testing Strategy
Test Levels
Level | Scope | Responsibility | Tools |
---|---|---|---|
Unit Testing | Individual components | Developer | Designer test mode |
Integration Testing | Module interactions | Developer | Runtime test |
System Testing | Complete solution | QA Team | Test scripts |
Acceptance Testing | Business requirements | Customer | Test procedures |
Test Documentation - Test Case Template
Test ID: TC 001 Feature: Pump Control |
---|
Preconditions:
|
Steps:
|
Expected Result:
|
Actual Result: |
Stage 4: Deploy (Production)
Deployment Planning
Pre-Deployment Checklist
- All tests passed
- Documentation complete
- Backup created
- Licenses verified
- Training completed
- Support plan ready
- Rollback plan prepared
- Maintenance window scheduled
Deployment Sequence
Deployment Sequence
|
Commissioning Process
System Commissioning Steps
System Comissoning Step
|
Commissioning Documentation
Document | Purpose | Responsibility |
---|---|---|
I/O List | Verify all points | Controls Engineer |
Loop Sheets | Test each control loop | Technician |
Alarm List | Verify alarm functions | Operations |
Interlock Matrix | Test safety interlocks | Safety Engineer |
Performance Log | Record system metrics | System Integrator |
Stage 5: Support (Maintenance)
Support Structure
Support Tiers
Support Ties
|
Maintenance Activities
Preventive Maintenance Schedule
Frequency | Tasks | Responsibility |
---|---|---|
Daily | Check system status, Review alarms, Monitor performance | Operations |
Weekly | Backup solution, Review logs, Check disk space | Maintenance |
Monthly | Archive data, Update documentation, Performance analysis | Engineering |
Quarterly | Security review, Disaster recovery test, Training update | Management |
Annually | License renewal, Major updates, System audit | All teams |
Continuous Improvement
Performance Monitoring
KPI Dashboard Example
|
Tools and Templates
Project Management Tools
FrameworX Native Tools
Tool | Purpose | Description |
---|---|---|
Track Cross-Reference | Governance | monitor governance of all places a object is used. |
Track RecentChanges | Version Control | light, built-in, record of latest used phases |
Track Unused objects | Optimization | Identify objects potentially not in use |
Track VersionControl | Version Control | Keep automated VersionID to all modules, tables and objects. Global VersionID for entire solution. |
Build, backup flag | Backup/Restore point | Crete a backup copy of product current stage |
Publish | Lock production version | FDA compliance, lock solution file version |
Third-party recommend tools
Tool | Purpose | Comments |
---|---|---|
JIRA//Azure DevOps | Task tracking | critical for maintenance and product phases |
Git/SVN | Version control | Add comparing version, in top of built-in FrameworX TrackChanges tools |
Confluence | Document management | All phases |
Teams/Slack | Communication | All phases |
Standard Templates
Available Templates
- Project Charter
- Requirements Specification
- Design Document
- Test Plan
- Deployment Guide
- Training Materials
- Support Procedures
- Change Request Form
Quality Gates
Gate Reviews
Gate Review
|
Best Practices
Do's and Don'ts
DO:
- ? Follow naming conventions consistently
- ? Document all decisions and changes
- ? Test thoroughly at each stage
- ? Include operators in design reviews
- ? Plan for 20-30% growth
- ? Use version control
- ? Create reusable components
DON'T:
- ? Skip testing to save time
- ? Ignore user feedback
- ? Hardcode values
- ? Forget security considerations
- ? Deploy without backups
- ? Assume requirements won't change
- ? Neglect documentation
Risk Management
Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
---|---|---|---|
Scope Creep | High | High | Clear change control process |
Integration Issues | Medium | High | Early testing, vendor support |
Performance Problems | Medium | Medium | Load testing, optimization |
User Resistance | Medium | Medium | Training, involvement, support |
Hardware Delays | Low | High | Early ordering, alternatives |
Workflow Optimization
Automation Opportunities
Manual Tasks → Automated Solutions
?????????????????????????????????
Tag Creation → Excel Import
Alarm Config → Template Application
Report Gen → Scheduled Tasks
Testing → Automated Scripts
Deployment → Scripted Installation
Backup → Automated Schedule
Collaboration Tips
Team | Best Practices |
---|---|
Team | Best Practices |
Cross-Functional | Regular sync meetings, shared workspace |
Remote Teams | Video calls, screen sharing, cloud tools |
Customer Interaction | Demos, prototypes, feedback sessions |
Vendor Coordination | Clear specifications, regular updates |
Next Steps
After Understanding Workflow
- Download Templates
- Review Examples
- Get Training