You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

1. The Problem

Food Manufacturer’s ERP system used standard costing models with assumptions that often varied up to 50% from reality. With sales demand exceeding capacity, management needed to decide which orders to accept or decline, but ERP data couldn’t reliably show true profitability by SKU.

2. The Solution:

                  [FrameworX Dashboards]
                   (Costing Analysis)
                           |
                    [Data Integration]
                     Historical + Real-time
                           |
        ???????????????????????????????????????
        |                  |                  |
   [D365 ERP]         [GE MES]        [GE Historian]
    (Cloud)      (Plant Applications)  (Production Data)
        |                  |                  |
        ???????????????????????????????????????
                           |
                   [Rockwell PLCs]
                    (Shop Floor)


Integrated real production data from MES, historian, and ERP with costing models to determine actual cost per SKU. Data included:

  • Raw material consumption

  • Packaging usage

  • Changeover times

  • Waste and rework

  • OEE and production states

FrameworX dashboards visualized this costing intelligence, enabling sales and operations to base decisions on actual margins rather than ERP standards.

Technical Specifications:

  • ERP: Microsoft D365 (Cloud)

  • MES: GE Plant Applications

  • Historian: GE Proficy Historian

  • Front End: Tatsoft FrameworX (dashboards for costing analysis)

  • PLCs: Rockwell Automation

  • Scope: Cost modeling based on years of historical production data

3. Key Enablers:

  • Real-time integration of production metrics with ERP costing

  • FrameworX dashboards to visualize true SKU profitability

  • Flexible data model that grows as more production metrics are tracked

4. The Results:

  • Identified SKUs and customers that appeared profitable but actually lost money

  • Allowed sales to prioritize high-margin orders during capacity constraints

  • Improved bottom line by 10–12% simply by shedding low-margin products

  • Provided sales and marketing tools for negotiating based on real costs

  • No labels