Monitoring 300+ Remote Stations

A major midstream operator needed to modernize monitoring across hundreds of remote pipeline stations while maintaining 24/7 operations. Legacy RTUs required expensive middleware, limited data collection, and provided no local intelligence.

EdgeConnect - Unified Namespace Originator

Deployment Pattern

Key Design Decisions

Architecture Components

Component

Specification

Quantity

Edge Nodes

EdgeConnect in Cisco routers

300+

Protocols

Modbus RTU, DNP3, HART

Multiple

Data Points

50-200 per site

500,000 total

Update Rate

10 seconds

Optimized

Redundancy

Store-and-forward, dual path

All sites


Edge Intelligence Configuration

At Each Station (EdgeConnect)

UNS Architecture

  1. Field Level: Sensors → PLCs/RTUs → EdgeConnect

  2. Edge UNS: Local namespace definition, context added

  3. Network: Process and manage data in the broker

Measured Outcomes

Operational Improvements

Technical Achievements

Build This Architecture

Deployment Time for Phase 1: 8-12 weeks for 50 sites
Current Stage: 300+ sites
Required Products:
EdgeConnect ($750/site), Enterprise Unlimited ($11,900), DataHub Station ($2,000 x 6)
Total Architecture Cost: ~$250,000 for complete 300-site system

1. The Problem

Challenge: Operate and observe hundreds of distributed midstream sites with PLCs and intermittent, bandwidth-limited links—while keeping on-site autonomy and ensuring a unified, secure, and scalable publish/subscribe model for corporate operations, analytics, and alarms.

Specific pain points:

Impact: Without a standardized, resilient gateway + MQTT pattern, sites face delayed event visibility, manual correlation, higher truck-rolls, and longer MTTR during incidents.

Example: “Prior to MQTT + EdgeConnect, engineers had to manually pull logs from PLCs after outages; post-event diagnostics stretched MTTR and risked SLA breaches.”

2. The Solution

2.1 Overview

2.2 Logical Diagram (high level)


Scada & Enterprise Applications
↑↓
Redundant Brokers
↑↓
EdgeConnect Product Edition
↑↓
PLCs on field:  DF1, ControlLogix, etc... 


2.3 Topology

Layer

Component

Role

Notes

Field

ControlLogix (CIP), DF1 devices

Signals/controls

-

Edge (Site)

EdgeConnect (Linux)

Collection, buffer, publish

Runs on router/IPC; AutoStart; Watchdog; local logging

Transport

Satellite / WAN

Telemetry backhaul

-

Brokers

MQTT brokers (HA, N=4)

Pub/Sub backbone

Persistent sessions, retained health topics

Consumers

SCADA/Historian/Analytics

Enterprise visibility & actions

-

2.4 Network Architecture

2.5 Redundancy & Failover

2.6 Protocols & Equipment

2.7 Data Model & Topics

2.8 Scale & Capacity

2.9 Observability & Health

3. Key Enablers

Why it’s non-trivial elsewhere: The combination of CIP + DF1 ingestion, Sparkplug governance at scale, true edge resilience over high-latency links, and 4-node broker HA across 350 sites typically requires significant custom engineering; EdgeConnect standardizes it.

4. The Results